REVIEW 2 cited by
Using neural networks for efficient evaluation of high multiplicity scattering amplitudes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Using neural networks for efficient evaluation of high multiplicity scattering amplitudes
read the original abstract
Precision theoretical predictions for high multiplicity scattering rely on the evaluation of increasingly complicated scattering amplitudes which come with an extremely high CPU cost. For state-of-the-art processes this can cause technical bottlenecks in the production of fully differential distributions. In this article we explore the possibility of using neural networks to approximate multi-variable scattering amplitudes and provide efficient inputs for Monte Carlo integration. We focus on QCD corrections to $e^+e^-\to$ jets up to one-loop and up to five jets. We demonstrate reliable interpolation when a series of networks are trained to amplitudes that have been divided into sectors defined by their infrared singularity structure. Complete simulations for one-loop distributions show speed improvements of at least an order of magnitude over a standard approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Novel Implementation of the Matrix Element Method at Next-to-Leading Order for the Measurement of the Higgs Self-Coupling ${\lambda}_{3H}$
A new POWHEG–MoMEMta interface and 'Block N' phase-space block realize the first MEM@NLO for gg→HH→bbγγ, recovering κλ=1 within ~0.5 expected uncertainty on Monte Carlo pseudo-experiments.
-
Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once
Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.