REVIEW 4 cited by
Estimating Uncertainty and Interpretability in Deep Learning for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep Learning has achieved state of the art performance in medical imaging. However, these methods for disease detection focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of classification or predictions without quantifying uncertainty in a decision. Knowing how much confidence there is in a computer-based medical diagnosis is essential for gaining clinicians trust in the technology and therefore improve treatment. Today, the 2019 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections are a major healthcare challenge around the world. Detecting COVID-19 in X-ray images is crucial for diagnosis, assessment and treatment. However, diagnostic uncertainty in the report is a challenging and yet inevitable task for radiologist. In this paper, we investigate how drop-weights based Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks (BCNN) can estimate uncertainty in Deep Learning solution to improve the diagnostic performance of the human-machine team using publicly available COVID-19 chest X-ray dataset and show that the uncertainty in prediction is highly correlates with accuracy of prediction. We believe that the availability of uncertainty-aware deep learning solution will enable a wider adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a clinical setting.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ProteoKnight: Convolution-based phage virion protein classification and uncertainty analysis
A color and distance modified DNA-walk encoding, classified by pretrained CNNs, reaches 90.8% binary accuracy on phage virion proteins with Monte Carlo Dropout uncertainty estimates.
-
Beyond the First Read: AI-Assisted Perceptual Error Detection in Chest Radiography Accounting for Interobserver Variability
A post-read AI system combines a YOLO detector with a non-overlap rule to flag chest X-ray regions a radiologist may have overlooked, reporting 0.78 recall and 0.44 precision on a synthetic missed-finding dataset.
-
A method for classification of data with uncertainty using hypothesis testing
A two-sided empirical quantile test on a model's score lets a binary classifier flag ambiguous or out-of-distribution inputs as uncertain instead of labeling them.
-
From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligence
A broad survey of uncertainty quantification techniques in AI, covering aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, methods, metrics, applications, and open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.