Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Estimating Uncertainty and Interpretability in Deep Learning for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.10769 v2 pith:EXJRFPTZ submitted 2020-03-22 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
keywords uncertaintydeeplearningcovid-19accuracycoronavirusdetectiondiagnosis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Learning has achieved state of the art performance in medical imaging. However, these methods for disease detection focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of classification or predictions without quantifying uncertainty in a decision. Knowing how much confidence there is in a computer-based medical diagnosis is essential for gaining clinicians trust in the technology and therefore improve treatment. Today, the 2019 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections are a major healthcare challenge around the world. Detecting COVID-19 in X-ray images is crucial for diagnosis, assessment and treatment. However, diagnostic uncertainty in the report is a challenging and yet inevitable task for radiologist. In this paper, we investigate how drop-weights based Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks (BCNN) can estimate uncertainty in Deep Learning solution to improve the diagnostic performance of the human-machine team using publicly available COVID-19 chest X-ray dataset and show that the uncertainty in prediction is highly correlates with accuracy of prediction. We believe that the availability of uncertainty-aware deep learning solution will enable a wider adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a clinical setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProteoKnight: Convolution-based phage virion protein classification and uncertainty analysis

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A color and distance modified DNA-walk encoding, classified by pretrained CNNs, reaches 90.8% binary accuracy on phage virion proteins with Monte Carlo Dropout uncertainty estimates.

  2. Beyond the First Read: AI-Assisted Perceptual Error Detection in Chest Radiography Accounting for Interobserver Variability

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A post-read AI system combines a YOLO detector with a non-overlap rule to flag chest X-ray regions a radiologist may have overlooked, reporting 0.78 recall and 0.44 precision on a synthetic missed-finding dataset.

  3. A method for classification of data with uncertainty using hypothesis testing

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A two-sided empirical quantile test on a model's score lets a binary classifier flag ambiguous or out-of-distribution inputs as uncertain instead of labeling them.

  4. From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A broad survey of uncertainty quantification techniques in AI, covering aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, methods, metrics, applications, and open challenges.

Pith tools