Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Pruning and Sparsemax Methods for Hierarchical Attention Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.04343 v1 pith:RWMAKYST submitted 2020-04-08 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords attentionhierarchicalnetworkssparsemaxclassificationsentenceswordsable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces and evaluates two novel Hierarchical Attention Network models [Yang et al., 2016] - i) Hierarchical Pruned Attention Networks, which remove the irrelevant words and sentences from the classification process in order to reduce potential noise in the document classification accuracy and ii) Hierarchical Sparsemax Attention Networks, which replace the Softmax function used in the attention mechanism with the Sparsemax [Martins and Astudillo, 2016], capable of better handling importance distributions where a lot of words or sentences have very low probabilities. Our empirical evaluation on the IMDB Review for sentiment analysis datasets shows both approaches to be able to match the results obtained by the current state-of-the-art (without, however, any significant benefits). All our source code is made available athttps://github.com/jmribeiro/dsl-project.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BGM-HAN: A Hierarchical Attention Network for Accurate and Fair Decision Assessment on Semi-Structured Profiles

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    BGM-HAN, a hierarchical attention model enhanced with byte-pair encoding, multi-head attention, and gated residuals, reports 85% accuracy on a proprietary admissions dataset, beating several baselines but with no sign...

Pith tools