Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.13912 v2 pith:6TUB3LWW submitted 2020-04-29 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords modelsneuralnamsadditivenetworkstheyaccuracycomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are powerful black-box predictors that have achieved impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks. However, their accuracy comes at the cost of intelligibility: it is usually unclear how they make their decisions. This hinders their applicability to high stakes decision-making domains such as healthcare. We propose Neural Additive Models (NAMs) which combine some of the expressivity of DNNs with the inherent intelligibility of generalized additive models. NAMs learn a linear combination of neural networks that each attend to a single input feature. These networks are trained jointly and can learn arbitrarily complex relationships between their input feature and the output. Our experiments on regression and classification datasets show that NAMs are more accurate than widely used intelligible models such as logistic regression and shallow decision trees. They perform similarly to existing state-of-the-art generalized additive models in accuracy, but are more flexible because they are based on neural nets instead of boosted trees. To demonstrate this, we show how NAMs can be used for multitask learning on synthetic data and on the COMPAS recidivism data due to their composability, and demonstrate that the differentiability of NAMs allows them to train more complex interpretable models for COVID-19.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 121 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. When, How Long and How Much? Interpretable Neural Networks for Time Series Regression by Learning to Mask and Aggregate

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MAGNETS learns unsupervised, mask-based concepts to make time-series regression predictions additively interpretable, recovering ground-truth temporal rules on synthetic tasks and beating interpretable baselines on mo...

  2. The Importance of Encoder Choice:A Tabular-Image Study

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Tabular encoder choice reorders multimodal rankings, can erase apparent fusion gains, and requires non-vanilla extraction for in-context learning models to avoid train-test representation shift.

  3. CoFrNets: Interpretable Neural Architecture Inspired by Continued Fractions

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoFrNet represents functions as stacked continued fractions with linear layers and reciprocal activation, but the universal approximation proof applies to a more general function class than the architecture used in ex...

Pith tools