Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.00813 v1 pith:VSEAS4RF submitted 2020-05-02 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords biasesmodelsdisabilitysocialundesirablementionstowardsaddiction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Building equitable and inclusive NLP technologies demands consideration of whether and how social attitudes are represented in ML models. In particular, representations encoded in models often inadvertently perpetuate undesirable social biases from the data on which they are trained. In this paper, we present evidence of such undesirable biases towards mentions of disability in two different English language models: toxicity prediction and sentiment analysis. Next, we demonstrate that the neural embeddings that are the critical first step in most NLP pipelines similarly contain undesirable biases towards mentions of disability. We end by highlighting topical biases in the discourse about disability which may contribute to the observed model biases; for instance, gun violence, homelessness, and drug addiction are over-represented in texts discussing mental illness.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Who Gets Left Behind? Auditing Disability Inclusivity in Large Language Models

    cs.CY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 17 LLMs, accessibility advice covers only about half of relevant disability categories on average, and speech and developmental conditions are the most neglected.

  2. Mitigating Confounding in Speech-Based Dementia Detection through Weight Masking

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Masking weights that react to gender in a fine-tuned BERT reduces gender gaps in dementia predictions while keeping most of the detection accuracy.

Pith tools