REVIEW 2 cited by
Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Building equitable and inclusive NLP technologies demands consideration of whether and how social attitudes are represented in ML models. In particular, representations encoded in models often inadvertently perpetuate undesirable social biases from the data on which they are trained. In this paper, we present evidence of such undesirable biases towards mentions of disability in two different English language models: toxicity prediction and sentiment analysis. Next, we demonstrate that the neural embeddings that are the critical first step in most NLP pipelines similarly contain undesirable biases towards mentions of disability. We end by highlighting topical biases in the discourse about disability which may contribute to the observed model biases; for instance, gun violence, homelessness, and drug addiction are over-represented in texts discussing mental illness.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Who Gets Left Behind? Auditing Disability Inclusivity in Large Language Models
Across 17 LLMs, accessibility advice covers only about half of relevant disability categories on average, and speech and developmental conditions are the most neglected.
-
Mitigating Confounding in Speech-Based Dementia Detection through Weight Masking
Masking weights that react to gender in a fine-tuned BERT reduces gender gaps in dementia predictions while keeping most of the detection accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.