Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bayesian Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.01490 v2 pith:A6XP4DMU submitted 2020-06-02 stat.ML astro-ph.IMcs.LG

classification stat.MLastro-ph.IMcs.LG
keywords neuralnetworksdatauncertaintybayesiananalysiserrorsmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent times, neural networks have become a powerful tool for the analysis of complex and abstract data models. However, their introduction intrinsically increases our uncertainty about which features of the analysis are model-related and which are due to the neural network. This means that predictions by neural networks have biases which cannot be trivially distinguished from being due to the true nature of the creation and observation of data or not. In order to attempt to address such issues we discuss Bayesian neural networks: neural networks where the uncertainty due to the network can be characterised. In particular, we present the Bayesian statistical framework which allows us to categorise uncertainty in terms of the ingrained randomness of observing certain data and the uncertainty from our lack of knowledge about how data can be created and observed. In presenting such techniques we show how errors in prediction by neural networks can be obtained in principle, and provide the two favoured methods for characterising these errors. We will also describe how both of these methods have substantial pitfalls when put into practice, highlighting the need for other statistical techniques to truly be able to do inference when using neural networks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DEF: Diffusion-augmented Ensemble Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A conditional diffusion model that generates perturbed initial states can turn any deterministic neural weather forecast model into an ensemble, with measured error reduction on a single ERA5 case study.

  2. Why Pool When You Can Flow? Active Learning with GFlowNets

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Training a GFlowNet to generate high-BALD molecules gives pool-size-independent acquisition and near-BALD classification quality on JAK2 virtual screening.

Pith tools