REVIEW 1 cited by
Natural Backdoor Attack on Text Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, advanced NLP models have seen a surge in the usage of various applications. This raises the security threats of the released models. In addition to the clean models' unintentional weaknesses, {\em i.e.,} adversarial attacks, the poisoned models with malicious intentions are much more dangerous in real life. However, most existing works currently focus on the adversarial attacks on NLP models instead of positioning attacks, also named \textit{backdoor attacks}. In this paper, we first propose the \textit{natural backdoor attacks} on NLP models. Moreover, we exploit the various attack strategies to generate trigger on text data and investigate different types of triggers based on modification scope, human recognition, and special cases. Last, we evaluate the backdoor attacks, and the results show the excellent performance of with 100\% backdoor attacks success rate and sacrificing of 0.83\% on the text classification task.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Merge Hijacking: Backdoor Attacks to Model Merging of Large Language Models
Merge Hijacking is a backdoor attack that lets a malicious LLM checkpoint poison any model it is merged with while preserving normal behavior.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.