Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

I call BS: Fraud Detection in Crowdfunding Campaigns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.16849 v1 pith:AB5FQYZJ submitted 2020-06-30 cs.CY cs.CRcs.LGcs.SI

classification cs.CYcs.CRcs.LGcs.SI
keywords fraudcampaignscrowdfundingplatformplatformstheybeenbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Donations to charity-based crowdfunding environments have been on the rise in the last few years. Unsurprisingly, deception and fraud in such platforms have also increased, but have not been thoroughly studied to understand what characteristics can expose such behavior and allow its automatic detection and blocking. Indeed, crowdfunding platforms are the only ones typically performing oversight for the campaigns launched in each service. However, they are not properly incentivized to combat fraud among users and the campaigns they launch: on the one hand, a platform's revenue is directly proportional to the number of transactions performed (since the platform charges a fixed amount per donation); on the other hand, if a platform is transparent with respect to how much fraud it has, it may discourage potential donors from participating. In this paper, we take the first step in studying fraud in crowdfunding campaigns. We analyze data collected from different crowdfunding platforms, and annotate 700 campaigns as fraud or not. We compute various textual and image-based features and study their distributions and how they associate with campaign fraud. Using these attributes, we build machine learning classifiers, and show that it is possible to automatically classify such fraudulent behavior with up to 90.14% accuracy and 96.01% AUC, only using features available from the campaign's description at the moment of publication (i.e., with no user or money activity), making our method applicable for real-time operation on a user browser.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Advanced LLM Multi-Agent Systems Based on Blackboard Architecture

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A blackboard-based LLM multi-agent system with controller-selected agents achieves competitive benchmark accuracy at lower token cost than several static and dynamically optimized baselines.

Pith tools