Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Opportunities and Challenges in Deep Learning Adversarial Robustness: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.00753 v2 pith:QE435LBD submitted 2020-07-01 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords adversarialalgorithmslearningsurveychallengesdefensedefensesmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As we seek to deploy machine learning models beyond virtual and controlled domains, it is critical to analyze not only the accuracy or the fact that it works most of the time, but if such a model is truly robust and reliable. This paper studies strategies to implement adversary robustly trained algorithms towards guaranteeing safety in machine learning algorithms. We provide a taxonomy to classify adversarial attacks and defenses, formulate the Robust Optimization problem in a min-max setting and divide it into 3 subcategories, namely: Adversarial (re)Training, Regularization Approach, and Certified Defenses. We survey the most recent and important results in adversarial example generation, defense mechanisms with adversarial (re)Training as their main defense against perturbations. We also survey mothods that add regularization terms that change the behavior of the gradient, making it harder for attackers to achieve their objective. Alternatively, we've surveyed methods which formally derive certificates of robustness by exactly solving the optimization problem or by approximations using upper or lower bounds. In addition, we discuss the challenges faced by most of the recent algorithms presenting future research perspectives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 28 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Certifiably robust malware detectors by design

    cs.CR 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new architecture joins a linear layer forced positive on attack perturbation vectors with a monotonic classifier, but the paper's theoretical characterization of robust detectors is mathematically trivial and does n...

  2. Approach to Finding a Robust Deep Learning Model

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A robustness measure based on the spread of test losses across independently trained instances, plus a pruning algorithm, selects stable small CNNs for calorimeter energy and position reconstruction.

Pith tools