Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Trace-Norm Adversarial Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.01855 v1 pith:ALB7SV4O submitted 2020-07-02 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

Trace-Norm Adversarial Examples

classification cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML
keywords adversarialexamplesstructuredalgorithmsallowdistortiondistortionsimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

White box adversarial perturbations are sought via iterative optimization algorithms most often minimizing an adversarial loss on a $l_p$ neighborhood of the original image, the so-called distortion set. Constraining the adversarial search with different norms results in disparately structured adversarial examples. Here we explore several distortion sets with structure-enhancing algorithms. These new structures for adversarial examples, yet pervasive in optimization, are for instance a challenge for adversarial theoretical certification which again provides only $l_p$ certificates. Because adversarial robustness is still an empirical field, defense mechanisms should also reasonably be evaluated against differently structured attacks. Besides, these structured adversarial perturbations may allow for larger distortions size than their $l_p$ counter-part while remaining imperceptible or perceptible as natural slight distortions of the image. Finally, they allow some control on the generation of the adversarial perturbation, like (localized) bluriness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.