Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BoxE: A Box Embedding Model for Knowledge Base Completion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06267 v2 pith:H4YZV2JU submitted 2020-07-13 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords boxeknowledgelogicalbaseembeddinglackmodelrules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge base completion (KBC) aims to automatically infer missing facts by exploiting information already present in a knowledge base (KB). A promising approach for KBC is to embed knowledge into latent spaces and make predictions from learned embeddings. However, existing embedding models are subject to at least one of the following limitations: (1) theoretical inexpressivity, (2) lack of support for prominent inference patterns (e.g., hierarchies), (3) lack of support for KBC over higher-arity relations, and (4) lack of support for incorporating logical rules. Here, we propose a spatio-translational embedding model, called BoxE, that simultaneously addresses all these limitations. BoxE embeds entities as points, and relations as a set of hyper-rectangles (or boxes), which spatially characterize basic logical properties. This seemingly simple abstraction yields a fully expressive model offering a natural encoding for many desired logical properties. BoxE can both capture and inject rules from rich classes of rule languages, going well beyond individual inference patterns. By design, BoxE naturally applies to higher-arity KBs. We conduct a detailed experimental analysis, and show that BoxE achieves state-of-the-art performance, both on benchmark knowledge graphs and on more general KBs, and we empirically show the power of integrating logical rules.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is Architectural Complexity Overrated? Competitive and Interpretable Knowledge Graph Completion with RelatE

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    RelatE, a real-valued phase-modulus embedding model, achieves the best reported MRR on YAGO3-10 (0.521) but falls far behind RotatE on WN18RR and relies on flawed formal proofs.

Pith tools