Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SBI -- A toolkit for simulation-based inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.09114 v2 pith:TC6K6YSU submitted 2020-07-17 cs.LG q-bio.QMstat.COstat.ML

classification cs.LGq-bio.QMstat.COstat.ML
keywords datainferenceparameterparameterssimulatorsalgorithmsbayesiancontrast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Scientists and engineers employ stochastic numerical simulators to model empirically observed phenomena. In contrast to purely statistical models, simulators express scientific principles that provide powerful inductive biases, improve generalization to new data or scenarios and allow for fewer, more interpretable and domain-relevant parameters. Despite these advantages, tuning a simulator's parameters so that its outputs match data is challenging. Simulation-based inference (SBI) seeks to identify parameter sets that a) are compatible with prior knowledge and b) match empirical observations. Importantly, SBI does not seek to recover a single 'best' data-compatible parameter set, but rather to identify all high probability regions of parameter space that explain observed data, and thereby to quantify parameter uncertainty. In Bayesian terminology, SBI aims to retrieve the posterior distribution over the parameters of interest. In contrast to conventional Bayesian inference, SBI is also applicable when one can run model simulations, but no formula or algorithm exists for evaluating the probability of data given parameters, i.e. the likelihood. We present $\texttt{sbi}$, a PyTorch-based package that implements SBI algorithms based on neural networks. $\texttt{sbi}$ facilitates inference on black-box simulators for practising scientists and engineers by providing a unified interface to state-of-the-art algorithms together with documentation and tutorials.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Biophysical Models of Large-Scale Multineuronal Data to Enable Precise Neurostimulation

    q-bio.NC 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hodgkin–Huxley models fit from extracellular electrical images and single-electrode thresholds predict unseen multi-electrode retinal stimulation responses at 90.6% accuracy.

  2. Probabilistic cosmological inference on HI tomographic data

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3D CNN encoder plus a masked autoregressive flow recovers Ωm and σ8 from simulated HI tomographic data cubes at z=1 with R² ≥ 0.91 on test sets, with reduced but still useful accuracy out of distribution.

  3. Implicit Likelihood Inference of the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy from Cosmological Data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simulation-based neural-likelihood analysis of Planck 2018 and DESI DR2 data reports a weak preference (tilde_Delta = 0.12, 68% CL interval spanning both signs) for the normal neutrino mass hierarchy.

Pith tools