Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Navigating the Trade-Off between Multi-Task Learning and Learning to Multitask in Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.10527 v2 pith:MESEFEZN submitted 2020-07-20 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords learningmulti-tasktasksmultitaskingnetworksrepresentationstrade-offagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The terms multi-task learning and multitasking are easily confused. Multi-task learning refers to a paradigm in machine learning in which a network is trained on various related tasks to facilitate the acquisition of tasks. In contrast, multitasking is used to indicate, especially in the cognitive science literature, the ability to execute multiple tasks simultaneously. While multi-task learning exploits the discovery of common structure between tasks in the form of shared representations, multitasking is promoted by separating representations between tasks to avoid processing interference. Here, we build on previous work involving shallow networks and simple task settings suggesting that there is a trade-off between multi-task learning and multitasking, mediated by the use of shared versus separated representations. We show that the same tension arises in deep networks and discuss a meta-learning algorithm for an agent to manage this trade-off in an unfamiliar environment. We display through different experiments that the agent is able to successfully optimize its training strategy as a function of the environment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond instruction-conditioning, MoTE: Mixture of Task Experts for Multi-task Embedding Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MoTE combines task-level mixture-of-experts routing with task-aware contrastive learning and beats instruction-conditioning on most MTEB tasks at equal active parameter count.

Pith tools