Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Visually Explaining Similarity Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.06035 v2 pith:FVVYSV3J submitted 2020-08-13 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords modelssimilarityvisualattentionexplainingmodelvisuallyapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of visually explaining similarity models, i.e., explaining why a model predicts two images to be similar in addition to producing a scalar score. While much recent work in visual model interpretability has focused on gradient-based attention, these methods rely on a classification module to generate visual explanations. Consequently, they cannot readily explain other kinds of models that do not use or need classification-like loss functions (e.g., similarity models trained with a metric learning loss). In this work, we bridge this crucial gap, presenting a method to generate gradient-based visual attention for image similarity predictors. By relying solely on the learned feature embedding, we show that our approach can be applied to any kind of CNN-based similarity architecture, an important step towards generic visual explainability. We show that our resulting attention maps serve more than just interpretability; they can be infused into the model learning process itself with new trainable constraints. We show that the resulting similarity models perform, and can be visually explained, better than the corresponding baseline models trained without these constraints. We demonstrate our approach using extensive experiments on three different kinds of tasks: generic image retrieval, person re-identification, and low-shot semantic segmentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transparency Techniques for Neural Networks trained on Writer Identification and Writer Verification

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pixel-level saliency maps outperform point-specific maps for explaining writer identification and verification networks, though the forensic-support claim rests on a limited qualitative evaluation.

Pith tools