Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.06775 v1 pith:6DUBUA4W submitted 2020-08-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CVstat.ML
keywords modelsubgrouppatchingperformancecamelclassfeaturesaugmentations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classifiers in machine learning are often brittle when deployed. Particularly concerning are models with inconsistent performance on specific subgroups of a class, e.g., exhibiting disparities in skin cancer classification in the presence or absence of a spurious bandage. To mitigate these performance differences, we introduce model patching, a two-stage framework for improving robustness that encourages the model to be invariant to subgroup differences, and focus on class information shared by subgroups. Model patching first models subgroup features within a class and learns semantic transformations between them, and then trains a classifier with data augmentations that deliberately manipulate subgroup features. We instantiate model patching with CAMEL, which (1) uses a CycleGAN to learn the intra-class, inter-subgroup augmentations, and (2) balances subgroup performance using a theoretically-motivated subgroup consistency regularizer, accompanied by a new robust objective. We demonstrate CAMEL's effectiveness on 3 benchmark datasets, with reductions in robust error of up to 33% relative to the best baseline. Lastly, CAMEL successfully patches a model that fails due to spurious features on a real-world skin cancer dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation via Evidential Alignment

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Evidential Alignment improves worst-group accuracy by upweighting a biased model's high-uncertainty errors and retraining the last layer with a calibration set, without group annotations.

  2. Elastic Representation: Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Group Robustness

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Elastic Representation regularizes the last-layer representation with nuclear and Frobenius norms, improving worst-group accuracy on CelebA, Waterbirds, and CivilComments without needing group labels.

  3. FairDropout: Using Example-Tied Dropout to Enhance Generalization of Minority Groups

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An example-tied dropout layer that drops per-example memorizing neurons at inference improves worst-group accuracy across five spurious-correlation benchmarks.

Pith tools