REVIEW 2 cited by
Resolving Intent Ambiguities by Retrieving Discriminative Clarifying Questions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Task oriented Dialogue Systems generally employ intent detection systems in order to map user queries to a set of pre-defined intents. However, user queries appearing in natural language can be easily ambiguous and hence such a direct mapping might not be straightforward harming intent detection and eventually the overall performance of a dialogue system. Moreover, acquiring domain-specific clarification questions is costly. In order to disambiguate queries which are ambiguous between two intents, we propose a novel method of generating discriminative questions using a simple rule based system which can take advantage of any question generation system without requiring annotated data of clarification questions. Our approach aims at discrimination between two intents but can be easily extended to clarification over multiple intents. Seeking clarification from the user to classify user intents not only helps understand the user intent effectively, but also reduces the roboticity of the conversation and makes the interaction considerably natural.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fewer Clarifications, Better Code: Benchmarking Cross-Session Personalized Ambiguity Adaptation in Coding Assistants
Twelve coding LLMs resolve injected user-specific ambiguity more often on the first turn when given same-user session history (average FT-ES +15.6 pp), though shuffled history explains part of the benefit.
-
Beyond Conversations: Spatially-Anchored Previews for Intent Disambiguation in LLM-Assisted Geometry Editing in Virtual Reality
Combining clarification questions with in-VR graphical previews in an LLM-assisted geometry editor reduces conversation rounds and steadies task progress compared with clarification alone.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.