Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.04104 v2 pith:NTCJEAWV submitted 2020-10-08 cs.LG

Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworks

classification cs.LG
keywords frontparetolearningdesiredpointentirehypernetworksmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems are prevalent in machine learning. These problems have a set of optimal solutions, called the Pareto front, where each point on the front represents a different trade-off between possibly conflicting objectives. Recent MOO methods can target a specific desired ray in loss space however, most approaches still face two grave limitations: (i) A separate model has to be trained for each point on the front; and (ii) The exact trade-off must be known before the optimization process. Here, we tackle the problem of learning the entire Pareto front, with the capability of selecting a desired operating point on the front after training. We call this new setup Pareto-Front Learning (PFL). We describe an approach to PFL implemented using HyperNetworks, which we term Pareto HyperNetworks (PHNs). PHN learns the entire Pareto front simultaneously using a single hypernetwork, which receives as input a desired preference vector and returns a Pareto-optimal model whose loss vector is in the desired ray. The unified model is runtime efficient compared to training multiple models and generalizes to new operating points not used during training. We evaluate our method on a wide set of problems, from multi-task regression and classification to fairness. PHNs learn the entire Pareto front at roughly the same time as learning a single point on the front and at the same time reach a better solution set. Furthermore, we show that PHNs can scale to generate large models like ResNet18. PFL opens the door to new applications where models are selected based on preferences that are only available at run time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PCD is a new gradient-based optimizer for hierarchical multi-objective problems that prioritizes primary descent with minimal controlled distortion for secondary objectives via a single tau parameter.

  2. Small RL Controller, Large Language Model: RL-Guided Adaptive Sampling for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RL-trained lightweight controller using answer statistics improves trade-offs among correctness, latency, and total samples in adaptive sampling for LLM test-time scaling.

  3. Representation-Aligned Multi-Scale Personalization for Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FRAMP generates client-specific models from compact descriptors in federated learning, trains tailored submodels, and aligns representations to balance personalization with global consistency.