Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.04495 v1 pith:XDJUCDKE submitted 2020-10-09 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords continuallearningmultitasktrainingdifferentminimasamesolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual (sequential) training and multitask (simultaneous) training are often attempting to solve the same overall objective: to find a solution that performs well on all considered tasks. The main difference is in the training regimes, where continual learning can only have access to one task at a time, which for neural networks typically leads to catastrophic forgetting. That is, the solution found for a subsequent task does not perform well on the previous ones anymore. However, the relationship between the different minima that the two training regimes arrive at is not well understood. What sets them apart? Is there a local structure that could explain the difference in performance achieved by the two different schemes? Motivated by recent work showing that different minima of the same task are typically connected by very simple curves of low error, we investigate whether multitask and continual solutions are similarly connected. We empirically find that indeed such connectivity can be reliably achieved and, more interestingly, it can be done by a linear path, conditioned on having the same initialization for both. We thoroughly analyze this observation and discuss its significance for the continual learning process. Furthermore, we exploit this finding to propose an effective algorithm that constrains the sequentially learned minima to behave as the multitask solution. We show that our method outperforms several state of the art continual learning algorithms on various vision benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 13 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Expert Training for Model Merging with Prompt Learning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dual-Tuned Experts (prompt learning then vision fine-tuning) shrink task-specific weight updates and consistently raise merged multi-task accuracy across CLIP merging methods.

  2. Grounding Functional Similarity by Invariance-Aware Model Stitching

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FuLA, a task-agnostic stitching objective that aligns intermediate features through the frozen end network, is claimed to be a more reliable functional similarity metric than task-based stitching.

Pith tools