REVIEW 2 cited by
Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Continual (sequential) training and multitask (simultaneous) training are often attempting to solve the same overall objective: to find a solution that performs well on all considered tasks. The main difference is in the training regimes, where continual learning can only have access to one task at a time, which for neural networks typically leads to catastrophic forgetting. That is, the solution found for a subsequent task does not perform well on the previous ones anymore. However, the relationship between the different minima that the two training regimes arrive at is not well understood. What sets them apart? Is there a local structure that could explain the difference in performance achieved by the two different schemes? Motivated by recent work showing that different minima of the same task are typically connected by very simple curves of low error, we investigate whether multitask and continual solutions are similarly connected. We empirically find that indeed such connectivity can be reliably achieved and, more interestingly, it can be done by a linear path, conditioned on having the same initialization for both. We thoroughly analyze this observation and discuss its significance for the continual learning process. Furthermore, we exploit this finding to propose an effective algorithm that constrains the sequentially learned minima to behave as the multitask solution. We show that our method outperforms several state of the art continual learning algorithms on various vision benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rethinking Expert Training for Model Merging with Prompt Learning
Dual-Tuned Experts (prompt learning then vision fine-tuning) shrink task-specific weight updates and consistently raise merged multi-task accuracy across CLIP merging methods.
-
Grounding Functional Similarity by Invariance-Aware Model Stitching
FuLA, a task-agnostic stitching objective that aligns intermediate features through the frozen end network, is claimed to be a more reliable functional similarity metric than task-based stitching.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.