REVIEW 1 cited by
Modeling quasielastic interactions of monoenergetic kaon decay-at-rest neutrinos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Monoenergetic muon neutrinos at 236 MeV are readily produced in intense medium-energy proton facilities ($\gtrsim$2-3~GeV) when a positive kaon decays at rest (KDAR; $K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu$). These neutrinos provide a unique opportunity to both study the neutrino interaction and probe the nucleus with a monoenergetic weak-interaction-only tool. We present cross section calculations for quasielastic scattering of these 236~MeV neutrinos off $^{12}$C and $^{40}$Ar, paying special attention to low-energy aspects of the scattering process. Our model takes the description of the nucleus in a mean-field (MF) approach as the starting point, where we solve Hartree-Fock (HF) equations using a Skyrme type nucleon-nucleon interaction. Thereby, we introduce long-range nuclear correlations by means of a continuum random phase approximation (CRPA) framework where we solve the CRPA equations using a Green's function method. The model successfully describes ($e,e'$) data on $^{12}$C and $^{40}$Ca in the kinematic region that overlaps with the KDAR $\nu_\mu$ phase space. In addition to these results, we present future prospects for precision KDAR cross section measurements and applications of our calculations in current and future experiments that will utilize these neutrinos.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Monte Carlo study of KDAR $\nu_{\mu}$ charged-current scattering on carbon
For 235.5 MeV KDAR muon-neutrino charged-current scattering on carbon, NuWro reproduces JSNS² missing-energy data better than GENIE or GiBUU, but all generators miss part of the data.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.