REVIEW 3 cited by
Setting the string shoving picture in a new frame
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Setting the string shoving picture in a new frame
read the original abstract
Based on the recent success of the \angantyr model in describing multiplicity distributions of the hadronic final state in high energy heavy ion collisions, we investigate how far one can go with a such a string-based scenario to describe also flow effects measured in such collisions. For this purpose we improve our previous so-called \textit{shoving} model, where strings that are close in space--time tend to repel each other in a way that could generate anisotropic flow, and we find that this model can indeed generate such flows in \AA\ collisions. The flow generated is not quite enough to reproduce measurements, but we identify some short-comings in the presented implementation of the model that, when fixed, could plausibly give a more realistic amount of flow.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Analysis note: Long-range near-side correlation in $e^+e^-$ with $W$-boson-pair events at 183-209 GeV with ALEPH archived data
Archived ALEPH data analysis finds ridge-like modulations and sign-changing v2 proxy in two-particle correlations for multiplicity above 30-50 in e+e- collisions with W+W- contribution, deviating from Monte Carlo predictions.
-
Herwig 7 with the Lund String Model: Tuning and Comparative Hadronization Studies
A Lund string model tune inside Herwig 7, the LH Tune, gives competitive descriptions of many LEP and LHC observables and enables fixed-shower comparison of string vs cluster hadronization.
-
The PYTHIA Facility
PYTHIA is presented as a 'big science facility' in software form: since 2018 its manuals drew ~9,600 citing works and ~47,000 unique authors across LHC, heavy-ion, flavor, astroparticle, and ML-for-physics communities.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.