Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Dialog Systems for Negotiation with Personality Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.09954 v2 pith:IN5RTYWR submitted 2020-10-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords dialognegotiationopponentspersonalityinferencemodeltypesability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore the ability to model and infer personality types of opponents, predict their responses, and use this information to adapt a dialog agent's high-level strategy in negotiation tasks. Inspired by the idea of incorporating a theory of mind (ToM) into machines, we introduce a probabilistic formulation to encapsulate the opponent's personality type during both learning and inference. We test our approach on the CraigslistBargain dataset and show that our method using ToM inference achieves a 20% higher dialog agreement rate compared to baselines on a mixed population of opponents. We also find that our model displays diverse negotiation behavior with different types of opponents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. We Argue to Agree: Towards Personality-Driven Argumentation-Based Negotiation Dialogue Systems for Tourism

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new LLM-generated dataset (PACT) of 8,687 personality-tagged, argumentation-annotated tourism negotiations, plus a three-part benchmark in which fine-tuned models beat zero-shot and human-human-data baselines.

Pith tools