REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring invisible neutrino decay at ESSnuSB
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Exploring invisible neutrino decay at ESSnuSB
read the original abstract
We explore invisible neutrino decay in which a heavy active neutrino state decays into a light sterile neutrino state and present a comparative analysis of two baseline options, $540~$km and $360~$km, for the ESSnuSB experimental setup. Our analysis shows that ESSnuSB can put a bound on the decay parameter $\tau_3/m_3 = 2.64~(1.68) \times 10^{-11}~$s/eV for the baseline option of $360~(540)~$km at $3 \sigma$. The expected bound obtained for $360~$km is slightly better than the corresponding one of DUNE for a charged current (CC) analysis. Furthermore, we show that the capability of ESSnuSB to discover decay, and to measure the decay parameter precisely, is better for the baseline option of $540~$km than that of $360~$km. Regarding effects of decay in $\delta_{\rm CP}$ measurements, we find that in general the CP violation discovery potential is better in the presence of decay. The change in CP precision is significant if one assumes decay in data but no decay in theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probing damping effects in neutrino oscillations with the first JUNO data
First JUNO data yields competitive bounds on decoherence and invisible decay parameters in neutrino oscillations while preserving standard oscillation measurements.
-
Searching non-standard interactions with atmospheric neutrinos at ESSnuSB
With 5.4 Mt·year atmospheric neutrino exposure, ESSnuSB could constrain |ε_eμ^m| < 0.053, |ε_eτ^m| < 0.057, |ε_μτ^m| < 0.021 and related diagonal differences at 90% CL, while NSI would alter mass ordering and θ23 octa...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.