Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.01956 v1 pith:J7HJVSHD submitted 2020-11-03 cs.GT cs.AI

classification cs.GTcs.AI
keywords evaluationfeatureslinearmechanismmechanismsqualityscorewelfare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by applications such as college admission and insurance rate determination, we propose an evaluation problem where the inputs are controlled by strategic individuals who can modify their features at a cost. A learner can only partially observe the features, and aims to classify individuals with respect to a quality score. The goal is to design an evaluation mechanism that maximizes the overall quality score, i.e., welfare, in the population, taking any strategic updating into account. We further study the algorithmic aspect of finding the welfare maximizing evaluation mechanism under two specific settings in our model. When scores are linear and mechanisms use linear scoring rules on the observable features, we show that the optimal evaluation mechanism is an appropriate projection of the quality score. When mechanisms must use linear thresholds, we design a polynomial time algorithm with a (1/4)-approximation guarantee when the underlying feature distribution is sufficiently smooth and admits an oracle for finding dense regions. We extend our results to settings where the prior distribution is unknown and must be learned from samples.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvements

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a linear strategic-classification model where manipulation can genuinely improve outcomes, the optimal strategic classifier is a parallel shift of the Bayes boundary, and it is a provably better proxy for the impro...

Pith tools