Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning: An insightful survey from the GDPR Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.05411 v5 pith:UJBHCZIW submitted 2020-11-10 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords datagdprprivacylearningtechniquesalongbecausecentre
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Along with the blooming of AI and Machine Learning-based applications and services, data privacy and security have become a critical challenge. Conventionally, data is collected and aggregated in a data centre on which machine learning models are trained. This centralised approach has induced severe privacy risks to personal data leakage, misuse, and abuse. Furthermore, in the era of the Internet of Things and big data in which data is essentially distributed, transferring a vast amount of data to a data centre for processing seems to be a cumbersome solution. This is not only because of the difficulties in transferring and sharing data across data sources but also the challenges on complying with rigorous data protection regulations and complicated administrative procedures such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this respect, Federated learning (FL) emerges as a prospective solution that facilitates distributed collaborative learning without disclosing original training data whilst naturally complying with the GDPR. Recent research has demonstrated that retaining data and computation on-device in FL is not sufficient enough for privacy-guarantee. This is because ML model parameters exchanged between parties in an FL system still conceal sensitive information, which can be exploited in some privacy attacks. Therefore, FL systems shall be empowered by efficient privacy-preserving techniques to comply with the GDPR. This article is dedicated to surveying on the state-of-the-art privacy-preserving techniques which can be employed in FL in a systematic fashion, as well as how these techniques mitigate data security and privacy risks. Furthermore, we provide insights into the challenges along with prospective approaches following the GDPR regulatory guidelines that an FL system shall implement to comply with the GDPR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Similarity Weighted Aggregation with Global Differential Privacy for Federated Brain Lesion Segmentation

    cs.AI 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    DP-SimAgg claims per-round (epsilon, delta)-DP for federated brain tumor segmentation by adding Gaussian noise after similarity-weighted aggregation, but the noise scale relies on an empirically estimated sensitivity ...

Pith tools