REVIEW 1 cited by
Sim-To-Real Transfer for Miniature Autonomous Car Racing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sim-to-real, a term that describes where a model is trained in a simulator then transferred to the real world, is a technique that enables faster deep reinforcement learning (DRL) training. However, differences between the simulator and the real world often cause the model to perform poorly in the real world. Domain randomization is a way to bridge the sim-to-real gap by exposing the model to a wide range of scenarios so that it can generalize to real-world situations. However, following domain randomization to train an autonomous car racing model with DRL can lead to undesirable outcomes. Namely, a model trained with randomization tends to run slower; a higher completion rate on the testing track comes at the expense of longer lap times. This paper aims to boost the robustness of a trained race car model without compromising racing lap times. For a training track and a testing track having the same shape (and same optimal paths), but with different lighting, background, etc., we first train a model (teacher model) that overfits the training track, moving along a near optimal path. We then use this model to teach a student model the correct actions along with randomization. With our method, a model with 18.4\% completion rate on the testing track is able to help teach a student model with 52\% completion. Moreover, over an average of 50 trials, the student is able to finish a lap 0.23 seconds faster than the teacher. This 0.23 second gap is significant in tight races, with lap times of about 10 to 12 seconds.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mini Autonomous Car Driving based on 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
On a visually complex simulated track, a slim 3D CNN beat LSTM and GRU recurrent models on average lap time, but the model choice was made on the same test track.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.