REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparison of Atom Representations in Graph Neural Networks for Molecular Property Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Graph neural networks have recently become a standard method for analysing chemical compounds. In the field of molecular property prediction, the emphasis is now put on designing new model architectures, and the importance of atom featurisation is oftentimes belittled. When contrasting two graph neural networks, the use of different atom features possibly leads to the incorrect attribution of the results to the network architecture. To provide a better understanding of this issue, we compare multiple atom representations for graph models and evaluate them on the prediction of free energy, solubility, and metabolic stability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first methodological study that focuses on the relevance of atom representation to the predictive performance of graph neural networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Investigating Graph Neural Networks and Classical Feature-Extraction Techniques in Activity-Cliff and Molecular Property Prediction
A systematic comparison shows ECFP fingerprints still beat GNNs at standard QSAR prediction, while GIN features and a new frequency-based fingerprint method (Sort & Slice) improve activity-cliff and property prediction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.