Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Sampling Overhead Analysis of Quantum Error Mitigation: Uncoded vs. Coded Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.08378 v1 pith:BZH4MORY submitted 2020-12-15 quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT

Sampling Overhead Analysis of Quantum Error Mitigation: Uncoded vs. Coded Systems

classification quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT
keywords overheadsamplingquantumerrorsanalysiserrorincurlowest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a promising technique of protecting hybrid quantum-classical computation from decoherence, but it suffers from sampling overhead which erodes the computational speed. In this treatise, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the sampling overhead imposed by QEM. In particular, we show that Pauli errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among a large class of realistic quantum channels having the same average fidelity. Furthermore, we show that depolarizing errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among all kinds of Pauli errors. Additionally, we conceive a scheme amalgamating QEM with quantum channel coding, and analyse its sampling overhead reduction compared to pure QEM. Especially, we observe that there exist a critical number of gates contained in quantum circuits, beyond which their amalgamation is preferable to pure QEM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.