Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Attack Attribution: Discovering Attributable Signals in Adversarial ML Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.02899 v1 pith:HMMSTWQH submitted 2021-01-08 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CV
keywords attackadversarialattackssystemsattributableattributiondiscoveringfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial inputs and researchers have demonstrated that even production systems, such as self-driving cars and ML-as-a-service offerings, are susceptible. These systems represent a target for bad actors. Their disruption can cause real physical and economic harm. When attacks on production ML systems occur, the ability to attribute the attack to the responsible threat group is a critical step in formulating a response and holding the attackers accountable. We pose the following question: can adversarially perturbed inputs be attributed to the particular methods used to generate the attack? In other words, is there a way to find a signal in these attacks that exposes the attack algorithm, model architecture, or hyperparameters used in the attack? We introduce the concept of adversarial attack attribution and create a simple supervised learning experimental framework to examine the feasibility of discovering attributable signals in adversarial attacks. We find that it is possible to differentiate attacks generated with different attack algorithms, models, and hyperparameters on both the CIFAR-10 and MNIST datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Review of Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning

    cs.CR 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review with small ART-based experiments showing adversarial attacks fool an object detector and a bone-fracture classifier, and that preprocessing defenses largely fail while defensive distillation appears stronger.

Pith tools