REVIEW 1 cited by
Baseline Pruning-Based Approach to Trojan Detection in Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper addresses the problem of detecting trojans in neural networks (NNs) by analyzing systematically pruned NN models. Our pruning-based approach consists of three main steps. First, detect any deviations from the reference look-up tables of model file sizes and model graphs. Next, measure the accuracy of a set of systematically pruned NN models following multiple pruning schemas. Finally, classify a NN model as clean or poisoned by applying a mapping between accuracy measurements and NN model labels. This work outlines a theoretical and experimental framework for finding the optimal mapping over a large search space of pruning parameters. Based on our experiments using Round 1 and Round 2 TrojAI Challenge datasets, the approach achieves average classification accuracy of 69.73 % and 82.41% respectively with an average processing time of less than 60 s per model. For both datasets random guessing would produce 50% classification accuracy. Reference model graphs and source code are available from GitHub.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BadScan: An Architectural Backdoor Attack on Visual State Space Models
BadScan is a trigger-activated architectural backdoor for VMamba that replaces the standard 2D selective scan with malformed scans at inference time.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.