Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing the Transformer Decoder with Transition-based Syntax

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.12640 v4 pith:QPMYLNCN submitted 2021-01-29 cs.CL cs.LG

Enhancing the Transformer Decoder with Transition-based Syntax

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords syntacticgeneralizationapproachdecoderdecodingincorporatingstructuresyntax
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Notwithstanding recent advances, syntactic generalization remains a challenge for text decoders. While some studies showed gains from incorporating source-side symbolic syntactic and semantic structure into text generation Transformers, very little work addressed the decoding of such structure. We propose a general approach for tree decoding using a transition-based approach. Examining the challenging test case of incorporating Universal Dependencies syntax into machine translation, we present substantial improvements on test sets that focus on syntactic generalization, while presenting improved or comparable performance on standard MT benchmarks. Further qualitative analysis addresses cases where syntactic generalization in the vanilla Transformer decoder is inadequate and demonstrates the advantages afforded by integrating syntactic information.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Linguistic Frameworks Go Toe-to-Toe at Neuro-Symbolic Language Modeling

    cs.CL 2021-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Semantic constituency graphs outperform syntactic constituency and dependency structures from seven formalisms when added to a Transformer for language modeling.