REVIEW 10 cited by
Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
On October 14th, 2020, researchers from OpenAI, the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, and other universities convened to discuss open research questions surrounding GPT-3, the largest publicly-disclosed dense language model at the time. The meeting took place under Chatham House Rules. Discussants came from a variety of research backgrounds including computer science, linguistics, philosophy, political science, communications, cyber policy, and more. Broadly, the discussion centered around two main questions: 1) What are the technical capabilities and limitations of large language models? 2) What are the societal effects of widespread use of large language models? Here, we provide a detailed summary of the discussion organized by the two themes above.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI
Persona-driven workflow and interface improve automated and human-AI red-teaming of generative AI by incorporating diverse perspectives into adversarial prompt creation.
-
On the Limits of Prompt-Conditioned Language Models as General-Purpose Learners
Prompt-conditioned LLMs face irreducible error floors from language's limited information capacity and alignment constraints, proven via PAC-Bayes bounds on bilevel cheap-talk games for certain task families.
-
PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI
PersonaTeaming Workflow improves automated red-teaming attack success rates over RainbowPlus using personas while maintaining diversity, and PersonaTeaming Playground supports human-AI collaboration in red-teaming as ...
-
Upskilling with Generative AI: Practices and Challenges for Freelance Knowledge Workers
Freelancers use generative AI to support exploratory skill acquisition but not as their main resource due to reliability issues, leading to a shift toward survival-oriented upskilling and the emergence of invisible co...
-
CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society
CAMEL proposes a role-playing framework with inception prompting that enables autonomous multi-agent cooperation among LLMs and generates conversational data for studying their behaviors.
-
Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned
RLHF-aligned language models show increasing resistance to red teaming with scale up to 52B parameters, unlike prompted or rejection-sampled models, supported by a released dataset of 38,961 attacks.
-
MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoning
MRKL is a modular neuro-symbolic architecture that integrates LLMs with external knowledge and discrete reasoning to overcome limitations of pure neural language models.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...
-
Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoning
VLA benchmark success rates cannot distinguish semantic generalization from physical reasoning due to an identifiability gap in current evaluation protocols.
-
Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle
A survey that maps reinforcement learning methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open-source tools across the full training lifecycle of large language models, focusing on verifiable-reward reasoning.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.