REVIEW 2 cited by
Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The widespread adoption of black-box models in Artificial Intelligence has enhanced the need for explanation methods to reveal how these obscure models reach specific decisions. Retrieving explanations is fundamental to unveil possible biases and to resolve practical or ethical issues. Nowadays, the literature is full of methods with different explanations. We provide a categorization of explanation methods based on the type of explanation returned. We present the most recent and widely used explainers, and we show a visual comparison among explanations and a quantitative benchmarking.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI
MUPAX's feature importance is a weighted average of masked inputs selected for low loss, and its accuracy gains stem from using ground-truth labels during mask selection.
-
Explaining deep neural network models for electricity price forecasting with XAI
SHAP and gradient explanations of five day-ahead electricity price forecasting DNNs reveal that the most recent price dominates forecasts, and new SSHAP aggregations help visualize these patterns.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.