REVIEW 1 cited by
Token-Modification Adversarial Attacks for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Many adversarial attacks target natural language processing systems, most of which succeed through modifying the individual tokens of a document. Despite the apparent uniqueness of each of these attacks, fundamentally they are simply a distinct configuration of four components: a goal function, allowable transformations, a search method, and constraints. In this survey, we systematically present the different components used throughout the literature, using an attack-independent framework which allows for easy comparison and categorisation of components. Our work aims to serve as a comprehensive guide for newcomers to the field and to spark targeted research into refining the individual attack components.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Towards Inclusive Toxic Content Moderation: Addressing Vulnerabilities to Adversarial Attacks in Toxicity Classifiers Tackling LLM-generated Content
Zeroing attack-vulnerable attention heads improves BERT/RoBERTa toxicity classifier accuracy on PGD-adversarial inputs, with distinct heads implicated per demographic group.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.