Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Few-Shot Fact-Checking via Perplexity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.09535 v1 pith:Q67XCNT7 submitted 2021-03-17 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords few-shotfact-checkinglearningmethodologyperplexitybaselinedatasetslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Few-shot learning has drawn researchers' attention to overcome the problem of data scarcity. Recently, large pre-trained language models have shown great performance in few-shot learning for various downstream tasks, such as question answering and machine translation. Nevertheless, little exploration has been made to achieve few-shot learning for the fact-checking task. However, fact-checking is an important problem, especially when the amount of information online is growing exponentially every day. In this paper, we propose a new way of utilizing the powerful transfer learning ability of a language model via a perplexity score. The most notable strength of our methodology lies in its capability in few-shot learning. With only two training samples, our methodology can already outperform the Major Class baseline by more than absolute 10% on the F1-Macro metric across multiple datasets. Through experiments, we empirically verify the plausibility of the rather surprising usage of the perplexity score in the context of fact-checking and highlight the strength of our few-shot methodology by comparing it to strong fine-tuning-based baseline models. Moreover, we construct and publicly release two new fact-checking datasets related to COVID-19.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ReflectFact: Self-Reflective Agents for Improving Comprehension and Reasoning in Multi-Hop Fact Verification

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A self-reflective agent pipeline with evidence-drift and reasoning-reflection checks reports new state-of-the-art Macro-F1 on HOVER and EX-FEVER multi-hop fact verification.

  2. Detecting Manipulated Contents Using Knowledge-Grounded Inference

    cs.CL 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Manicod combines live web retrieval with an LLM to detect zero-day manipulated news, reporting F1 0.856 on a new dataset of 4,270 manipulated headlines and large gains over existing benchmarks.

Pith tools