REVIEW 4 cited by
On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Following the success in advancing natural language processing and understanding, transformers are expected to bring revolutionary changes to computer vision. This work provides a comprehensive study on the robustness of vision transformers (ViTs) against adversarial perturbations. Tested on various white-box and transfer attack settings, we find that ViTs possess better adversarial robustness when compared with MLP-Mixer and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) including ConvNeXt, and this observation also holds for certified robustness. Through frequency analysis and feature visualization, we summarize the following main observations contributing to the improved robustness of ViTs: 1) Features learned by ViTs contain less high-frequency patterns that have spurious correlation, which helps explain why ViTs are less sensitive to high-frequency perturbations than CNNs and MLP-Mixer, and there is a high correlation between how much the model learns high-frequency features and its robustness against different frequency-based perturbations. 2) Introducing convolutional or tokens-to-token blocks for learning high-frequency features in ViTs can improve classification accuracy but at the cost of adversarial robustness. 3) Modern CNN designs that borrow techniques from ViTs including activation function, layer norm, larger kernel size to imitate the global attention, and patchify the images as inputs, etc., could help bridge the performance gap between ViTs and CNNs not only in terms of performance, but also certified and empirical adversarial robustness. Moreover, we show adversarial training is also applicable to ViT for training robust models, and sharpness-aware minimization can also help improve robustness, while pre-training with clean images on larger datasets does not significantly improve adversarial robustness.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Are Fast Methods Stable in Adversarially Robust Transfer Learning?
FGSM adversarial fine-tuning avoids catastrophic overfitting at standard eps=4 and 8 and matches PGD robustness within 1.4% at a quarter of the training time.
-
AdvReal: Physical Adversarial Patch Generation Framework for Security Evaluation of Object Detection Systems
AdvReal generates clothing textures via joint 2D-3D adversarial training with non-rigid cloth and lighting simulation, reporting higher attack success against pedestrian detectors than prior patch methods.
-
Breaking the Illusion of Security via Interpretation: Interpretable Vision Transformer Systems under Attack
AdViT generates adversarial images that make ViT classifiers misclassify while keeping attribution maps nearly identical to benign inputs, with high white-box success and useful black-box transferability after genetic...
-
Attacking Attention of Foundation Models Disrupts Downstream Tasks
A task-agnostic attack that perturbs attention and embeddings of CLIP/ViT backbones degrades classification, retrieval, captioning, segmentation, and depth estimation without using labels or text.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.