Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Avalanche: an End-to-End Library for Continual Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.00405 v1 pith:UHI42G2S submitted 2021-04-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords learningcontinualavalancheend-to-endlibraryacrossalgorithmicalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning continually from non-stationary data streams is a long-standing goal and a challenging problem in machine learning. Recently, we have witnessed a renewed and fast-growing interest in continual learning, especially within the deep learning community. However, algorithmic solutions are often difficult to re-implement, evaluate and port across different settings, where even results on standard benchmarks are hard to reproduce. In this work, we propose Avalanche, an open-source end-to-end library for continual learning research based on PyTorch. Avalanche is designed to provide a shared and collaborative codebase for fast prototyping, training, and reproducible evaluation of continual learning algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HEM: a margin-based loss for visual categorisation tasks

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new margin-based loss, HEM, trains image classifiers that are more robust to unknown and adversarial inputs and better at continual learning and segmentation than cross-entropy-trained models.

  2. Addressing Popularity Bias in Third-Party Library Recommendations Using LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Open-source Llama models fail to overcome popularity bias in third-party library recommendations, with low recall across all six tested configurations.

Pith tools