REVIEW 2 cited by
SpeechStew: Simply Mix All Available Speech Recognition Data to Train One Large Neural Network
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SpeechStew: Simply Mix All Available Speech Recognition Data to Train One Large Neural Network
read the original abstract
We present SpeechStew, a speech recognition model that is trained on a combination of various publicly available speech recognition datasets: AMI, Broadcast News, Common Voice, LibriSpeech, Switchboard/Fisher, Tedlium, and Wall Street Journal. SpeechStew simply mixes all of these datasets together, without any special re-weighting or re-balancing of the datasets. SpeechStew achieves SoTA or near SoTA results across a variety of tasks, without the use of an external language model. Our results include 9.0\% WER on AMI-IHM, 4.7\% WER on Switchboard, 8.3\% WER on CallHome, and 1.3\% on WSJ, which significantly outperforms prior work with strong external language models. We also demonstrate that SpeechStew learns powerful transfer learning representations. We fine-tune SpeechStew on a noisy low resource speech dataset, CHiME-6. We achieve 38.9\% WER without a language model, which compares to 38.6\% WER to a strong HMM baseline with a language model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
OLMoASR: Open Models and Data for Training Robust Speech Recognition Models
An open 1M-hour English speech dataset plus Whisper-architecture models trained on it match Whisper's word error rates on short and long-form benchmarks.
-
CAM\~OES: A Comprehensive Automatic Speech Recognition Benchmark for European Portuguese
CAMOES is a new open benchmark and model collection for European Portuguese ASR, cutting word error rate by about 35% over the best zero-shot model.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.