REVIEW 2 cited by
Joint Passage Ranking for Diverse Multi-Answer Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study multi-answer retrieval, an under-explored problem that requires retrieving passages to cover multiple distinct answers for a given question. This task requires joint modeling of retrieved passages, as models should not repeatedly retrieve passages containing the same answer at the cost of missing a different valid answer. In this paper, we introduce JPR, the first joint passage retrieval model for multi-answer retrieval. JPR makes use of an autoregressive reranker that selects a sequence of passages, each conditioned on previously selected passages. JPR is trained to select passages that cover new answers at each timestep and uses a tree-decoding algorithm to enable flexibility in the degree of diversity. Compared to prior approaches, JPR achieves significantly better answer coverage on three multi-answer datasets. When combined with downstream question answering, the improved retrieval enables larger answer generation models since they need to consider fewer passages, establishing a new state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CORG: Generating Answers from Complex, Interrelated Contexts
CORG, a graph-based context grouping framework, improves disambiguated answer recall on QA with distracting, ambiguous, counterfactual, and duplicated contexts, and reaches performance comparable to per-document proce...
-
GOSU: Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Global-Level Optimized Semantic Unit-Centric Framework
GOSU globally merges semantic units from text chunks into a unit-centric knowledge graph and uses three-tier keyword retrieval to improve RAG generation quality, according to LLM-judge win rates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.