REVIEW 2 cited by
Ultra-low frequency gravitational waves from cosmological and astrophysical processes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Ultra-low frequency gravitational waves from cosmological and astrophysical processes
read the original abstract
Gravitational waves (GWs) at ultra-low frequencies (${\lesssim 100\,\mathrm{nHz}}$) are key to understanding the assembly and evolution of astrophysical black hole (BH) binaries with masses $\sim 10^{6}-10^{9}\,M_\odot$ at low redshifts. These GWs also offer a unique window into a wide variety of cosmological processes. Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are beginning to measure this stochastic signal at $\sim 1-100\,\mathrm{nHz}$ and the combination of data from several arrays is expected to confirm a detection in the next few years. The dominant physical processes generating gravitational radiation at $\mathrm{nHz}$ frequencies are still uncertain. PTA observations alone are currently unable to distinguish a binary BH astrophysical foreground from a cosmological background due to, say, a first order phase transition at a temperature $\sim 1-100\,\mathrm{MeV}$ in a weakly-interacting dark sector. This letter explores the extent to which incorporating integrated bounds on the ultra-low frequency GW spectrum from any combination of cosmic microwave background, big bang nucleosynethesis or astrometric observations can help to break this degeneracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Are PTA measurements sensitive to gravitational wave non-Gaussianities?
PTA statistical tests lose sensitivity to non-Gaussian GW features after decorrelation and cannot distinguish them model-agnostically.
-
Are PTA measurements sensitive to gravitational wave non-Gaussianities?
PTA statistical tests cannot distinguish Gaussian and non-Gaussian GWB amplitude distributions in a model-agnostic way after decorrelation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.