Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.13562 v2 pith:RWPXP4AE submitted 2021-05-28 cs.CL cs.AI

ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords legalsystemcorpuscourtildcpredictioncaseexperts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

An automated system that could assist a judge in predicting the outcome of a case would help expedite the judicial process. For such a system to be practically useful, predictions by the system should be explainable. To promote research in developing such a system, we introduce ILDC (Indian Legal Documents Corpus). ILDC is a large corpus of 35k Indian Supreme Court cases annotated with original court decisions. A portion of the corpus (a separate test set) is annotated with gold standard explanations by legal experts. Based on ILDC, we propose the task of Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation (CJPE). The task requires an automated system to predict an explainable outcome of a case. We experiment with a battery of baseline models for case predictions and propose a hierarchical occlusion based model for explainability. Our best prediction model has an accuracy of 78% versus 94% for human legal experts, pointing towards the complexity of the prediction task. The analysis of explanations by the proposed algorithm reveals a significant difference in the point of view of the algorithm and legal experts for explaining the judgments, pointing towards scope for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLMs for LLMs: A Structured Prompting Methodology for Long Legal Documents

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    On CUAD legal contracts, a prompt-engineered QWEN-2 pipeline with chunking and two answer-selection heuristics reportedly outperforms the fine-tuned DeBERTa-large baseline by about 9%, reaching claimed state-of-the-ar...

  2. Annotating Topical Legal Insights from Case Proceedings

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    LeDA is a legal annotation tool with dynamic tag creation and adjudication, used to tag 200 Indian Supreme Court cases with thematic concepts like 'Murder on parole.'