REVIEW 11 cited by
Goal Misgeneralization in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study goal misgeneralization, a type of out-of-distribution generalization failure in reinforcement learning (RL). Goal misgeneralization failures occur when an RL agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues the wrong goal. For instance, an agent might continue to competently avoid obstacles, but navigate to the wrong place. In contrast, previous works have typically focused on capability generalization failures, where an agent fails to do anything sensible at test time. We formalize this distinction between capability and goal generalization, provide the first empirical demonstrations of goal misgeneralization, and present a partial characterization of its causes.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
When Does Reward Teach State? A Hidden-Automaton Instrument and the Group-Language Boundary
An RL agent can earn high reward while its representation of a hidden DFA's state stays at chance; a white-box hidden-DFA instrument measures this decoupling, and permutation/group structure flags such perception gaps...
-
When Does Reward Teach State? A Hidden-Automaton Instrument and the Group-Language Boundary
High reward in sparse RL does not imply latent-state recovery; a hidden-DFA instrument separates perception from planning gaps and flags group-language structure as a pre-training warning.
-
Understanding Goal Generalisation in Sequential Reinforcement Learning
Empirical analysis of over 100 sequential RL training pipelines across 250+ OOD environments finds salient features drive generalization and early goals persist, with latent policy gradients simulating latent variable...
-
Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces
A latent mediation framework with sparse autoencoders enables non-additive token-level influence attribution in LLMs by learning orthogonal features and back-propagating attributions.
-
Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models
World models enable efficient AI planning but create risks from adversarial corruption, goal misgeneralization, and human bias, demonstrated via attacks that amplify errors and reduce rewards on models like RSSM and D...
-
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.
-
GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model
GPT-NeoX-20B is a publicly released 20B parameter autoregressive language model trained on the Pile that shows strong gains in five-shot reasoning over similarly sized prior models.
-
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
RLHF alignment training on language models boosts NLP performance, supports skill specialization, enables weekly online updates with fresh human data, and shows a linear relation between RL reward and sqrt(KL divergen...
-
Draining the Energy Commons: Self-Defeating Over-Appropriation as a Coordination Failure in Agentic LLM Collectives
LLM prosumers deplete a shared renewable reserve exactly when demand exceeds peak replacement, acting like impatient open-access users even when sustaining the reserve is feasible.
-
Safe Multi-Agent Behavior Must Be Maintained, Not Merely Asserted: Constraint Drift in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
Safety constraints in LLM-based multi-agent systems commonly weaken during execution through memory, communication, and tool use, requiring them to be maintained as explicit state rather than asserted once.
-
Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use
A harmonized risk reporting standard for internal frontier AI model use, structured around autonomous misbehavior and insider threats using means, motive, and opportunity factors.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.