Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Supporting Cognitive and Emotional Empathic Writing of Students

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.14815 v1 pith:WA5VPGQH submitted 2021-05-31 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords empathyannotationcognitiveemotionalmodelspeerschemestudents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an annotation approach to capturing emotional and cognitive empathy in student-written peer reviews on business models in German. We propose an annotation scheme that allows us to model emotional and cognitive empathy scores based on three types of review components. Also, we conducted an annotation study with three annotators based on 92 student essays to evaluate our annotation scheme. The obtained inter-rater agreement of {\alpha}=0.79 for the components and the multi-{\pi}=0.41 for the empathy scores indicate that the proposed annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to a substantial to moderate agreement. Moreover, we trained predictive models to detect the annotated empathy structures and embedded them in an adaptive writing support system for students to receive individual empathy feedback independent of an instructor, time, and location. We evaluated our tool in a peer learning exercise with 58 students and found promising results for perceived empathy skill learning, perceived feedback accuracy, and intention to use. Finally, we present our freely available corpus of 500 empathy-annotated, student-written peer reviews on business models and our annotation guidelines to encourage future research on the design and development of empathy support systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reviewriter: AI-Generated Instructions For Peer Review Writing

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reviewriter fine-tuned a German GPT-2 model on 11,925 student peer reviews and found positive self-reported acceptance among 14 students, despite mixed relevance of the generated instructions.

Pith tools