REVIEW 2 cited by
FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Client contribution evaluation, also known as data valuation, is a crucial approach in federated learning(FL) for client selection and incentive allocation. However, due to restrictions of accessibility of raw data, only limited information such as local weights and local data size of each client is open for quantifying the client contribution. Using data size from available information, we introduce an empirical evaluation method called Federated Client Contribution Evaluation through Accuracy Approximation(FedCCEA). This method builds the Accuracy Approximation Model(AAM), which estimates a simulated test accuracy using inputs of sampled data size and extracts the clients' data quality and data size to measure client contribution. FedCCEA strengthens some advantages: (1) enablement of data size selection to the clients, (2) feasible evaluation time regardless of the number of clients, and (3) precise estimation in non-IID settings. We demonstrate the superiority of FedCCEA compared to previous methods through several experiments: client contribution distribution, client removal, and robustness test to partial participation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MTF-Grasp: A Multi-tier Federated Learning Approach for Robotic Grasping
MTF-Grasp, a two-tier federated learning method that seeds low-data robots with models pre-trained by high-quality clients, reports up to 8% higher grasp accuracy than vanilla FedAvg under data quantity skew.
-
Overcoming Challenges of Partial Client Participation in Federated Learning : A Comprehensive Review
A survey categorizing and comparing twelve federated learning methods for partial client participation, weakened by several citation mismatches and unsourced benchmark numbers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.