Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Efficient Active Search for Combinatorial Optimization Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.05126 v3 pith:JQZAZ5DZ submitted 2021-06-09 cs.LG cs.AImath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.OC
keywords searchactivemethodslearningmodelcombinatorialefficientproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently numerous machine learning based methods for combinatorial optimization problems have been proposed that learn to construct solutions in a sequential decision process via reinforcement learning. While these methods can be easily combined with search strategies like sampling and beam search, it is not straightforward to integrate them into a high-level search procedure offering strong search guidance. Bello et al. (2016) propose active search, which adjusts the weights of a (trained) model with respect to a single instance at test time using reinforcement learning. While active search is simple to implement, it is not competitive with state-of-the-art methods because adjusting all model weights for each test instance is very time and memory intensive. Instead of updating all model weights, we propose and evaluate three efficient active search strategies that only update a subset of parameters during the search. The proposed methods offer a simple way to significantly improve the search performance of a given model and outperform state-of-the-art machine learning based methods on combinatorial problems, even surpassing the well-known heuristic solver LKH3 on the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Finally, we show that (efficient) active search enables learned models to effectively solve instances that are much larger than those seen during training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synergizing Reinforcement Learning and Genetic Algorithms for Neural Combinatorial Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A plug-and-play mechanism that mixes genetic-algorithm evolution into RL training for neural routing solvers gives small benchmark gains, but its stability theorem is not valid as proven.

  2. HeatACO: A Heatmap-Guided Max--Min Ant System for Large-Scale Travelling Salesman Problems

    cs.NE 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    HeatACO, a Max-Min Ant System decoder biased by a neural heatmap prior, reaches 0.11%/0.23%/1.15% optimality gaps on TSP500/1K/10K with seconds-to-minutes CPU decoding time.

Pith tools