REVIEW 1 cited by
Are standard Object Segmentation models sufficient for Learning Affordance Segmentation?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Affordances are the possibilities of actions the environment offers to the individual. Ordinary objects (hammer, knife) usually have many affordances (grasping, pounding, cutting), and detecting these allow artificial agents to understand what are their possibilities in the environment, with obvious application in Robotics. Proposed benchmarks and state-of-the-art prediction models for supervised affordance segmentation are usually modifications of popular object segmentation models such as Mask R-CNN. We observe that theoretically, these popular object segmentation methods should be sufficient for detecting affordances masks. So we ask the question: is it necessary to tailor new architectures to the problem of learning affordances? We show that applying the out-of-the-box Mask R-CNN to the problem of affordances segmentation outperforms the current state-of-the-art. We conclude that the problem of supervised affordance segmentation is included in the problem of object segmentation and argue that better benchmarks for affordance learning should include action capacities.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Weakly-Supervised Affordance Grounding Guided by Part-Level Semantic Priors
A pseudo-supervised pipeline with an affordance-to-part mapping, label refinement, cross-view alignment, and a reasoning module achieves state-of-the-art weakly supervised affordance grounding on AGD20K.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.