Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are standard Object Segmentation models sufficient for Learning Affordance Segmentation?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.02095 v1 pith:XVMOWGK7 submitted 2021-07-05 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords segmentationaffordancesaffordanceobjectproblemlearningmodelsbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Affordances are the possibilities of actions the environment offers to the individual. Ordinary objects (hammer, knife) usually have many affordances (grasping, pounding, cutting), and detecting these allow artificial agents to understand what are their possibilities in the environment, with obvious application in Robotics. Proposed benchmarks and state-of-the-art prediction models for supervised affordance segmentation are usually modifications of popular object segmentation models such as Mask R-CNN. We observe that theoretically, these popular object segmentation methods should be sufficient for detecting affordances masks. So we ask the question: is it necessary to tailor new architectures to the problem of learning affordances? We show that applying the out-of-the-box Mask R-CNN to the problem of affordances segmentation outperforms the current state-of-the-art. We conclude that the problem of supervised affordance segmentation is included in the problem of object segmentation and argue that better benchmarks for affordance learning should include action capacities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weakly-Supervised Affordance Grounding Guided by Part-Level Semantic Priors

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pseudo-supervised pipeline with an affordance-to-part mapping, label refinement, cross-view alignment, and a reasoning module achieves state-of-the-art weakly supervised affordance grounding on AGD20K.

Pith tools