Pith. sign in

REVIEW

EvoBA: An Evolution Strategy as a Strong Baseline forBlack-Box Adversarial Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.05754 v1 pith:2MOZGJ57 submitted 2021-07-12 cs.CR cs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG
keywords textbfadversarialblack-boxattacksattackevobabaselineclassifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Recent work has shown how easily white-box adversarial attacks can be applied to state-of-the-art image classifiers. However, real-life scenarios resemble more the black-box adversarial conditions, lacking transparency and usually imposing natural, hard constraints on the query budget. We propose $\textbf{EvoBA}$, a black-box adversarial attack based on a surprisingly simple evolutionary search strategy. $\textbf{EvoBA}$ is query-efficient, minimizes $L_0$ adversarial perturbations, and does not require any form of training. $\textbf{EvoBA}$ shows efficiency and efficacy through results that are in line with much more complex state-of-the-art black-box attacks such as $\textbf{AutoZOOM}$. It is more query-efficient than $\textbf{SimBA}$, a simple and powerful baseline black-box attack, and has a similar level of complexity. Therefore, we propose it both as a new strong baseline for black-box adversarial attacks and as a fast and general tool for gaining empirical insight into how robust image classifiers are with respect to $L_0$ adversarial perturbations. There exist fast and reliable $L_2$ black-box attacks, such as $\textbf{SimBA}$, and $L_{\infty}$ black-box attacks, such as $\textbf{DeepSearch}$. We propose $\textbf{EvoBA}$ as a query-efficient $L_0$ black-box adversarial attack which, together with the aforementioned methods, can serve as a generic tool to assess the empirical robustness of image classifiers. The main advantages of such methods are that they run fast, are query-efficient, and can easily be integrated in image classifiers development pipelines. While our attack minimises the $L_0$ adversarial perturbation, we also report $L_2$, and notice that we compare favorably to the state-of-the-art $L_2$ black-box attack, $\textbf{AutoZOOM}$, and of the $L_2$ strong baseline, $\textbf{SimBA}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools