Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speech

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.08720 v1 pith:3QE27FEO submitted 2021-07-19 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords counterdatacollectiondatasetnarrativegenerationhatehuman-in-the-loop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Undermining the impact of hateful content with informed and non-aggressive responses, called counter narratives, has emerged as a possible solution for having healthier online communities. Thus, some NLP studies have started addressing the task of counter narrative generation. Although such studies have made an effort to build hate speech / counter narrative (HS/CN) datasets for neural generation, they fall short in reaching either high-quality and/or high-quantity. In this paper, we propose a novel human-in-the-loop data collection methodology in which a generative language model is refined iteratively by using its own data from the previous loops to generate new training samples that experts review and/or post-edit. Our experiments comprised several loops including dynamic variations. Results show that the methodology is scalable and facilitates diverse, novel, and cost-effective data collection. To our knowledge, the resulting dataset is the only expert-based multi-target HS/CN dataset available to the community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Think Like a Person Before Responding: A Multi-Faceted Evaluation of Persona-Guided LLMs for Countering Hate

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Persona- and emotion-guided prompts make LLM counter-narratives more empathetic and readable, but generated responses remain verbose, college-level, and sometimes classified as hateful.

  2. Understanding and Analyzing Inappropriately Targeting Language in Online Discourse: A Comparative Annotation Study

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A comparative annotation study finds ChatGPT over-identifies inappropriate targeting in Reddit conversations and uncovers four new target categories beyond the standard hate speech classes.

Pith tools