Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Information

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.09044 v2 pith:DB32WVFQ submitted 2021-07-19 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYstat.ML
keywords groupaccuracystandardtrainingworst-groupachieveannotationsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Standard training via empirical risk minimization (ERM) can produce models that achieve high accuracy on average but low accuracy on certain groups, especially in the presence of spurious correlations between the input and label. Prior approaches that achieve high worst-group accuracy, like group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) require expensive group annotations for each training point, whereas approaches that do not use such group annotations typically achieve unsatisfactory worst-group accuracy. In this paper, we propose a simple two-stage approach, JTT, that first trains a standard ERM model for several epochs, and then trains a second model that upweights the training examples that the first model misclassified. Intuitively, this upweights examples from groups on which standard ERM models perform poorly, leading to improved worst-group performance. Averaged over four image classification and natural language processing tasks with spurious correlations, JTT closes 75% of the gap in worst-group accuracy between standard ERM and group DRO, while only requiring group annotations on a small validation set in order to tune hyperparameters.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recti-Q: Feature-Space Rectification for Out-of-Distribution-Robust Quantized Perception in Edge Robotics

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Recti-Q measures a 'Quantization-Induced Robustness Gap' in 4-bit PTQ vision models and shows a small head-level LoRA adapter trained on source data recovers part of the lost out-of-distribution accuracy.

  2. Beyond Synthetic Augmentation: Group-Aware Threshold Calibration for Robust Balanced Accuracy in Imbalanced Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    On two imbalanced financial benchmarks, group-specific decision thresholds outperform or match SMOTE and CT-GAN augmentation across seven model families.

Pith tools