REVIEW 1 cited by
Comment on "Do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity"
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
There is no conclusive theoretical argument that would require the quantization of the gravitational field. A paradox presented by Mari et al. [Sci. Rep. 6, 22777 (2016)] and its resolution by Belenchia et al. [Phys. Rev. D 98, 126009 (2018)] did not change anything about this assertion. Despite being interesting in other respects, efforts of a recent work by Ryding, Aurell, and Pikovski [arXiv:2107.07514] to further establish the inconclusiveness of the question of necessity of quantization are futile.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Why Do We Want a Theory of Quantum Gravity?
The search for quantum gravity is primarily motivated by theoretical and conceptual concerns, and most proposed motivations are optional desiderata rather than necessary constraints on the theory.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.