Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.04617 v2 pith:L52Q3R7B submitted 2021-09-10 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords tasktaskstogethertraininggroupingslearningmethodmulti-task
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-task learning can leverage information learned by one task to benefit the training of other tasks. Despite this capacity, naively training all tasks together in one model often degrades performance, and exhaustively searching through combinations of task groupings can be prohibitively expensive. As a result, efficiently identifying the tasks that would benefit from training together remains a challenging design question without a clear solution. In this paper, we suggest an approach to select which tasks should train together in multi-task learning models. Our method determines task groupings in a single run by training all tasks together and quantifying the effect to which one task's gradient would affect another task's loss. On the large-scale Taskonomy computer vision dataset, we find this method can decrease test loss by 10.0% compared to simply training all tasks together while operating 11.6 times faster than a state-of-the-art task grouping method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TLDChoiceNet: Quantitatively Choosing a Transfer Learning Dataset

    cs.CV 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A method and two metrics aim to predict which pretraining dataset transfers best to a target image classification task, validated only on plant leaf classification.

Pith tools